@OptiBiz1 The reason for less/no response **may be** due to the fact that most frequent forum visitors are non-developers like me
. As
@frm.mwz suggested, a good number of people will be able to contribute in terms of "money". We can make a checklist of features and interested parties can contribute towards the feature they want (or a common donation). MW is one of those RARE platforms that don't take upgrade charges, so I guess a good number of ppl will be happy to contribute. If this model is practical and is within the policies of
@twisted1919 , I'll also be happy to contribute
. But yeah, the real problem will be finding devs.
Another great advantage I see here is, MW is missing a feature roadmap (no way I'm blaming twisted
). So, if we contribute and develop features under twisted's coordination, we can avoid situations where we pay and implement a feature first but on the next version that feature comes as standard with MW.