Dear
@twisted1919
Thanks for your answer.
Yes, I also added Dkim and I managed to send it with the client's email from address, and got a
-2.0 spam score.
Something is missing to improve it, because when I use my delivery email addresses (with my servers domains), I get a
-4.9 spam score.
(Below I show you the spam-score details)
Otherwise, bounces are working well on Mailwizz when I use an email address from the same server domain that I use to deliver (check box) to send, but NOT with my client address.
(To the margin: I do not know what will happen when I activate all the servers for send, because until now, the tests have been done only with 1 server per test, and not with all simultaneously)
The question is: the bounce processor (from GitHub) will serve me for this?? that bounces arrives at Mailwizz and not to my client
From address?.....correct or not?
Returning to the spam-score
1) These are "my client" spam headers for the test I do:
..................................................................................................................................
Content analysis details: (-2.0 points, 5.0 required)
Pts rule name description
---------------------- ------------------------ --------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
For more information.
[URIs: domain.com]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[Score: 0.0000]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
..............................................................................................................................................
2) And these are the ones I get with the From addresses of my servers domains:
...........................................................................................................................
Content analysis details: (-4.9 points, 5.0 required)
Pts rule name description
---------------------- ------------------------ --------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
For more information.
[URIs: domain.com]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-2.9 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[Score: 0.0000]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
................................................................................................................................................
The only difference is:
-2.9 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
Any ideas to get this with my client emails?
Or what is missing for this to happen?
Thank you and regards.